I need to test a directive, and it should throw an exception. How can I test that the exception was thrown, in jasmine?
我需要测试一个指令,它应该抛出异常。如何在茉莉花中测试抛出异常?
The directives link function:
指令链接功能:
link: function() {
if(something) {
throw new TypeError('Error message');
}
}
I have not yet successfully implemented a test that actually catches the error and reports that the test was successful.
我还没有成功实现一个实际捕获错误并报告测试成功的测试。
4 个解决方案
#1
20
This is how I do it:
我是这样做的:
describe("myDirective", function() {
it("should throw an error", inject(function ($compile, $rootScope) {
function errorFunctionWrapper()
{
$compile(angular.element("<div my-directive></div>"))($rootScope);
}
expect(errorFunctionWrapper).toThrow();
}));
});
#2
7
it("should throw an error", inject(function ($compile, $rootScope) {
expect(function () {
$compile(angular.element("<directive-name></directive-name>"))($rootScope.$new());
}).toThrow();
}));
#3
2
EDIT: this seems to be fixed now. Tested with Angular 1.6.4.
编辑:这似乎现在修复。用Angular 1.6.4测试。
In Angular 1.6, I'm been unable to catch errors thrown during the $compile
phase. While not as elegant, I can still check against the $exceptionHandler.errors
array (source):
在Angular 1.6中,我无法捕获$ compile阶段抛出的错误。虽然不那么优雅,但我仍然可以检查$ exceptionHandler.errors数组(源代码):
it('throws an error', function() {
$compile(angular.element('<directive-name></directive-name>'))($rootScope.$new());
expect($exceptionHandler.errors.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
});
Better yet, provide it with the exact error message(s):
更好的是,为它提供确切的错误消息:
expect($exceptionHandler.errors).toEqual(['first error', 'second error'])
#4
0
exception handling in angular testing is better done with native angular service
角度测试中的异常处理最好使用原生角度服务
https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng/service/$exceptionHandler
https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng/service/$exceptionHandler
this gives better handle on the thrown exceptions and provide a better native angular way to handle exception globally. say if at some point in time you can change the exception handling strategy of you application in a single place.
这样可以更好地处理抛出的异常,并提供更好的原生角度方式来全局处理异常。如果在某个时间点,您可以在一个地方更改应用程序的异常处理策略。
in testing this when used along with $exceptionHandlerProvider
与$ exceptionHandlerProvider一起使用时测试它
https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ngMock/provider/$exceptionHandlerProvider
https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ngMock/provider/$exceptionHandlerProvider
gives you a better handle on the generated exception and write specific tests.
为您提供更好的处理生成的异常并编写特定的测试。
for unit tests it is not a standard way in angular to validate an exception using .toThrow(); method of jasmine.
对于单元测试,使用.toThrow()验证异常不是角度的标准方法;茉莉花的方法。
#1
20
This is how I do it:
我是这样做的:
describe("myDirective", function() {
it("should throw an error", inject(function ($compile, $rootScope) {
function errorFunctionWrapper()
{
$compile(angular.element("<div my-directive></div>"))($rootScope);
}
expect(errorFunctionWrapper).toThrow();
}));
});
#2
7
it("should throw an error", inject(function ($compile, $rootScope) {
expect(function () {
$compile(angular.element("<directive-name></directive-name>"))($rootScope.$new());
}).toThrow();
}));
#3
2
EDIT: this seems to be fixed now. Tested with Angular 1.6.4.
编辑:这似乎现在修复。用Angular 1.6.4测试。
In Angular 1.6, I'm been unable to catch errors thrown during the $compile
phase. While not as elegant, I can still check against the $exceptionHandler.errors
array (source):
在Angular 1.6中,我无法捕获$ compile阶段抛出的错误。虽然不那么优雅,但我仍然可以检查$ exceptionHandler.errors数组(源代码):
it('throws an error', function() {
$compile(angular.element('<directive-name></directive-name>'))($rootScope.$new());
expect($exceptionHandler.errors.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
});
Better yet, provide it with the exact error message(s):
更好的是,为它提供确切的错误消息:
expect($exceptionHandler.errors).toEqual(['first error', 'second error'])
#4
0
exception handling in angular testing is better done with native angular service
角度测试中的异常处理最好使用原生角度服务
https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng/service/$exceptionHandler
https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng/service/$exceptionHandler
this gives better handle on the thrown exceptions and provide a better native angular way to handle exception globally. say if at some point in time you can change the exception handling strategy of you application in a single place.
这样可以更好地处理抛出的异常,并提供更好的原生角度方式来全局处理异常。如果在某个时间点,您可以在一个地方更改应用程序的异常处理策略。
in testing this when used along with $exceptionHandlerProvider
与$ exceptionHandlerProvider一起使用时测试它
https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ngMock/provider/$exceptionHandlerProvider
https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ngMock/provider/$exceptionHandlerProvider
gives you a better handle on the generated exception and write specific tests.
为您提供更好的处理生成的异常并编写特定的测试。
for unit tests it is not a standard way in angular to validate an exception using .toThrow(); method of jasmine.
对于单元测试,使用.toThrow()验证异常不是角度的标准方法;茉莉花的方法。