We all know that global variables are anything but best practice. But there are several instances when it is difficult to code without them. What techniques do you use to avoid the use of global variables?
我们都知道全局变量不是最佳实践。但是有几个例子是很难在没有它们的情况下进行编码的。您使用什么技术来避免使用全局变量?
For example, given the following scenario, how would you not use a global variable?
例如,给定以下场景,如何不使用全局变量?
JavaScript code:
JavaScript代码:
var uploadCount = 0;
window.onload = function() {
var frm = document.forms[0];
frm.target = "postMe";
frm.onsubmit = function() {
startUpload();
return false;
}
}
function startUpload() {
var fil = document.getElementById("FileUpload" + uploadCount);
if (!fil || fil.value.length == 0) {
alert("Finished!");
document.forms[0].reset();
return;
}
disableAllFileInputs();
fil.disabled = false;
alert("Uploading file " + uploadCount);
document.forms[0].submit();
}
Relevant markup:
相关的标记:
<iframe src="test.htm" name="postHere" id="postHere"
onload="uploadCount++; if(uploadCount > 1) startUpload();"></iframe>
<!-- MUST use inline JavaScript here for onload event
to fire after each form submission. -->
This code comes from a web form with multiple <input type="file">
. It uploads the files one at a time to prevent huge requests. It does this by POSTing to the iframe, waiting for the response which fires the iframe onload, and then triggers the next submission.
此代码来自具有多个的web表单。它一次上传一个文件,以防止巨大的请求。它通过发布到iframe,等待触发iframe onload的响应,然后触发下一次提交。
You don't have to answer this example specifically, I am just providing it for reference to a situation in which I am unable to think of a way to avoid global variables.
您不必特别地回答这个示例,我只是提供它以供参考,在这种情况下,我无法想出避免全局变量的方法。
10 个解决方案
#1
61
The easiest way is to wrap your code in a closure and manually expose only those variables you need globally to the global scope:
最简单的方法是将您的代码封装在一个闭包中,并手动将您需要的全局变量暴露给全局范围:
(function() {
// Your code here
// Expose to global
window['varName'] = varName;
})();
To address Crescent Fresh's comment: in order to remove global variables from the scenario entirely, the developer would need to change a number of things assumed in the question. It would look a lot more like this:
要解决Crescent Fresh的注释:为了从场景中完全删除全局变量,开发人员需要修改问题中假定的一些东西。它看起来更像这样:
Javascript:
Javascript:
(function() {
var addEvent = function(element, type, method) {
if('addEventListener' in element) {
element.addEventListener(type, method, false);
} else if('attachEvent' in element) {
element.attachEvent('on' + type, method);
// If addEventListener and attachEvent are both unavailable,
// use inline events. This should never happen.
} else if('on' + type in element) {
// If a previous inline event exists, preserve it. This isn't
// tested, it may eat your baby
var oldMethod = element['on' + type],
newMethod = function(e) {
oldMethod(e);
newMethod(e);
};
} else {
element['on' + type] = method;
}
},
uploadCount = 0,
startUpload = function() {
var fil = document.getElementById("FileUpload" + uploadCount);
if(!fil || fil.value.length == 0) {
alert("Finished!");
document.forms[0].reset();
return;
}
disableAllFileInputs();
fil.disabled = false;
alert("Uploading file " + uploadCount);
document.forms[0].submit();
};
addEvent(window, 'load', function() {
var frm = document.forms[0];
frm.target = "postMe";
addEvent(frm, 'submit', function() {
startUpload();
return false;
});
});
var iframe = document.getElementById('postHere');
addEvent(iframe, 'load', function() {
uploadCount++;
if(uploadCount > 1) {
startUpload();
}
});
})();
HTML:
HTML:
<iframe src="test.htm" name="postHere" id="postHere"></iframe>
You don't need an inline event handler on the <iframe>
, it will still fire on each load with this code.
在
Regarding the load event
关于加载事件
Here is a test case demonstrating that you don't need an inline onload
event. This depends on referencing a file (/emptypage.php) on the same server, otherwise you should be able to just paste this into a page and run it.
这里有一个测试用例,说明您不需要内联onload事件。这取决于在同一台服务器上引用文件(/emptypage.php),否则您应该能够将其粘贴到页面中并运行它。
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<title>untitled</title>
</head>
<body>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
(function() {
var addEvent = function(element, type, method) {
if('addEventListener' in element) {
element.addEventListener(type, method, false);
} else if('attachEvent' in element) {
element.attachEvent('on' + type, method);
// If addEventListener and attachEvent are both unavailable,
// use inline events. This should never happen.
} else if('on' + type in element) {
// If a previous inline event exists, preserve it. This isn't
// tested, it may eat your baby
var oldMethod = element['on' + type],
newMethod = function(e) {
oldMethod(e);
newMethod(e);
};
} else {
element['on' + type] = method;
}
};
// Work around IE 6/7 bug where form submission targets
// a new window instead of the iframe. SO suggestion here:
// http://*.com/q/875650
var iframe;
try {
iframe = document.createElement('<iframe name="postHere">');
} catch (e) {
iframe = document.createElement('iframe');
iframe.name = 'postHere';
}
iframe.name = 'postHere';
iframe.id = 'postHere';
iframe.src = '/emptypage.php';
addEvent(iframe, 'load', function() {
alert('iframe load');
});
document.body.appendChild(iframe);
var form = document.createElement('form');
form.target = 'postHere';
form.action = '/emptypage.php';
var submit = document.createElement('input');
submit.type = 'submit';
submit.value = 'Submit';
form.appendChild(submit);
document.body.appendChild(form);
})();
</script>
</body>
</html>
The alert fires every time I click the submit button in Safari, Firefox, IE 6, 7 and 8.
每当我点击Safari、Firefox、IE 6、7和8中的submit按钮时,警报就会触发。
#2
51
I suggest the module pattern.
我建议使用模块模式。
YAHOO.myProject.myModule = function () {
//"private" variables:
var myPrivateVar = "I can be accessed only from within YAHOO.myProject.myModule.";
//"private" method:
var myPrivateMethod = function () {
YAHOO.log("I can be accessed only from within YAHOO.myProject.myModule");
}
return {
myPublicProperty: "I'm accessible as YAHOO.myProject.myModule.myPublicProperty."
myPublicMethod: function () {
YAHOO.log("I'm accessible as YAHOO.myProject.myModule.myPublicMethod.");
//Within myProject, I can access "private" vars and methods:
YAHOO.log(myPrivateVar);
YAHOO.log(myPrivateMethod());
//The native scope of myPublicMethod is myProject; we can
//access public members using "this":
YAHOO.log(this.myPublicProperty);
}
};
}(); // the parens here cause the anonymous function to execute and return
#3
7
First off, it is impossible to avoid global JavaScript, something will always be dangling the global scope. Even if you create a namespace, which is still a good idea, that namespace will be global.
首先,要避免全局JavaScript是不可能的,总会有一些东西在全局范围中摇摆不定。即使您创建了一个名称空间(这仍然是一个好主意),该名称空间也将是全局的。
There are many approaches, however, to not abuse the global scope. Two of the simplest are to either use closure, or since you only have one variable you need to keep track of, just set it as a property of the function itself (which can then be treated as a static
variable).
然而,有许多方法可以避免滥用全球范围。最简单的两种方法是使用闭包,或者由于您只需要跟踪一个变量,只需将其设置为函数本身的属性(然后可以将其视为静态变量)。
Closure
var startUpload = (function() {
var uploadCount = 1; // <----
return function() {
var fil = document.getElementById("FileUpload" + uploadCount++); // <----
if(!fil || fil.value.length == 0) {
alert("Finished!");
document.forms[0].reset();
uploadCount = 1; // <----
return;
}
disableAllFileInputs();
fil.disabled = false;
alert("Uploading file " + uploadCount);
document.forms[0].submit();
};
})();
* Note that incrementing of uploadCount
is happening internally here
注意,uploadCount的递增是在内部发生的
Function Property
var startUpload = function() {
startUpload.uploadCount = startUpload.count || 1; // <----
var fil = document.getElementById("FileUpload" + startUpload.count++);
if(!fil || fil.value.length == 0) {
alert("Finished!");
document.forms[0].reset();
startUpload.count = 1; // <----
return;
}
disableAllFileInputs();
fil.disabled = false;
alert("Uploading file " + startUpload.count);
document.forms[0].submit();
};
I'm not sure why uploadCount++; if(uploadCount > 1) ...
is necessary, as it looks like the condition will always be true. But if you do need global access to the variable, then the function property method I described above will allow you to do so without the variable actually being global.
我不知道为什么是uploadCount++;如果(uploadCount > 1)……这是必要的,因为它看起来是真实的。但是如果您确实需要对变量进行全局访问,那么我上面描述的函数属性方法将允许您这样做,而不需要变量实际上是全局的。
<iframe src="test.htm" name="postHere" id="postHere"
onload="startUpload.count++; if (startUpload.count > 1) startUpload();"></iframe>
However, if that's the case, then you should probably use an object literal or instantiated object and go about this in the normal OO way (where you can use the module pattern if it strikes your fancy).
但是,如果是这样,那么您可能应该使用对象文字或实例化对象,并使用常规的OO方式(如果符合您的要求,您可以使用模块模式)。
#4
4
window.onload = function() {
var frm = document.forms[0];
frm.target = "postMe";
frm.onsubmit = function() {
frm.onsubmit = null;
var uploader = new LazyFileUploader();
uploader.startUpload();
return false;
}
}
function LazyFileUploader() {
var uploadCount = 0;
var total = 10;
var prefix = "FileUpload";
var upload = function() {
var fil = document.getElementById(prefix + uploadCount);
if(!fil || fil.value.length == 0) {
alert("Finished!");
document.forms[0].reset();
return;
}
disableAllFileInputs();
fil.disabled = false;
alert("Uploading file " + uploadCount);
document.forms[0].submit();
uploadCount++;
if (uploadCount < total) {
setTimeout(function() {
upload();
}, 100);
}
}
this.startUpload = function() {
setTimeout(function() {
upload();
}, 100);
}
}
#5
3
Sometimes it makes sense to have global variables in JavaScript. But don't leave them hanging directly off window like that.
有时在JavaScript中使用全局变量是有意义的。但不要让它们像那样直接挂在窗外。
Instead, create a single "namespace" object to contain your globals. For bonus points, put everything in there, including your methods.
相反,创建一个“名称空间”对象来包含全局变量。为了奖励积分,把所有东西都放进去,包括你的方法。
#6
1
Some things are going to be in the global namespace -- namely, whatever function you're calling from your inline JavaScript code.
有些东西将会出现在全局命名空间中——也就是说,无论您从内联JavaScript代码中调用的函数是什么。
In general, the solution is to wrap everything in a closure:
一般来说,解决方案是把所有东西都包在一个闭包里:
(function() {
var uploadCount = 0;
function startupload() { ... }
document.getElementById('postHere').onload = function() {
uploadCount ++;
if (uploadCount > 1) startUpload();
};
})();
and avoid the inline handler.
避免使用内联处理程序。
#7
1
Using closures might be OK for small to medium projects. However, for big projects, you might want to split your code into modules and save them in different files.
对于中小型项目,使用闭包可能是可行的。但是,对于大型项目,您可能希望将代码分割为模块,并将它们保存到不同的文件中。
Therefore I wrote jQuery Secret plugin to solve the problem.
所以我写了jQuery Secret插件来解决这个问题。
In your case with this plugin the code would look something like the following.
在这个插件中,代码应该如下所示。
JavaScript:
// Initialize uploadCount.
$.secret( 'in', 'uploadCount', 0 ).
// Store function disableAllFileInputs.
secret( 'in', 'disableAllFileInputs', function(){
// Code for 'disable all file inputs' goes here.
// Store function startUpload
}).secret( 'in', 'startUpload', function(){
// 'this' points to the private object in $.secret
// where stores all the variables and functions
// ex. uploadCount, disableAllFileInputs, startUpload.
var fil = document.getElementById( 'FileUpload' + uploadCount);
if(!fil || fil.value.length == 0) {
alert( 'Finished!' );
document.forms[0].reset();
return;
}
// Use the stored disableAllFileInputs function
// or you can use $.secret( 'call', 'disableAllFileInputs' );
// it's the same thing.
this.disableAllFileInputs();
fil.disabled = false;
// this.uploadCount is equal to $.secret( 'out', 'uploadCount' );
alert( 'Uploading file ' + this.uploadCount );
document.forms[0].submit();
// Store function iframeOnload
}).secret( 'in', 'iframeOnload', function(){
this.uploadCount++;
if( this.uploadCount > 1 ) this.startUpload();
});
window.onload = function() {
var frm = document.forms[0];
frm.target = "postMe";
frm.onsubmit = function() {
// Call out startUpload function onsubmit
$.secret( 'call', 'startUpload' );
return false;
}
}
Relevant markup:
<iframe src="test.htm" name="postHere" id="postHere" onload="$.secret( 'call', 'iframeOnload' );"></iframe>
Open your Firebug, you will find no globals at all, not even the funciton :)
打开您的Firebug,您将发现根本没有全局变量,甚至连函数都没有:)
For full documentation, please see here.
For a demo page, please see this.
Source code on GitHub.
#8
1
Other way to do this is to create an object and then add methods to it.
另一种方法是创建一个对象,然后向其添加方法。
var object = {
a = 21,
b = 51
};
object.displayA = function() {
console.log(object.a);
};
object.displayB = function() {
console.log(object.b);
};
In this way, only object 'obj' is exposed and methods attached to it. It is equivalent to adding it in namespace.
通过这种方式,只公开对象“obj”和附加的方法。它等价于在命名空间中添加它。
#9
0
Use closures. Something like this gives you a scope other than global.
使用闭包。像这样的东西会给你一个范围以外的范围。
(function() {
// Your code here
var var1;
function f1() {
if(var1){...}
}
window.var_name = something; //<- if you have to have global var
window.glob_func = function(){...} //<- ...or global function
})();
#10
0
For "securing" induvidual global variables:
对于“保护”相关全局变量:
function gInitUploadCount() {
var uploadCount = 0;
gGetUploadCount = function () {
return uploadCount;
}
gAddUploadCount= function () {
uploadCount +=1;
}
}
gInitUploadCount();
gAddUploadCount();
console.log("Upload counter = "+gGetUploadCount());
I'm a novice to JS, currently using this in one project. (i apreciate any comment and criticism)
我是JS的新手,目前在一个项目中使用这个。(我收到任何评论和批评)
#1
61
The easiest way is to wrap your code in a closure and manually expose only those variables you need globally to the global scope:
最简单的方法是将您的代码封装在一个闭包中,并手动将您需要的全局变量暴露给全局范围:
(function() {
// Your code here
// Expose to global
window['varName'] = varName;
})();
To address Crescent Fresh's comment: in order to remove global variables from the scenario entirely, the developer would need to change a number of things assumed in the question. It would look a lot more like this:
要解决Crescent Fresh的注释:为了从场景中完全删除全局变量,开发人员需要修改问题中假定的一些东西。它看起来更像这样:
Javascript:
Javascript:
(function() {
var addEvent = function(element, type, method) {
if('addEventListener' in element) {
element.addEventListener(type, method, false);
} else if('attachEvent' in element) {
element.attachEvent('on' + type, method);
// If addEventListener and attachEvent are both unavailable,
// use inline events. This should never happen.
} else if('on' + type in element) {
// If a previous inline event exists, preserve it. This isn't
// tested, it may eat your baby
var oldMethod = element['on' + type],
newMethod = function(e) {
oldMethod(e);
newMethod(e);
};
} else {
element['on' + type] = method;
}
},
uploadCount = 0,
startUpload = function() {
var fil = document.getElementById("FileUpload" + uploadCount);
if(!fil || fil.value.length == 0) {
alert("Finished!");
document.forms[0].reset();
return;
}
disableAllFileInputs();
fil.disabled = false;
alert("Uploading file " + uploadCount);
document.forms[0].submit();
};
addEvent(window, 'load', function() {
var frm = document.forms[0];
frm.target = "postMe";
addEvent(frm, 'submit', function() {
startUpload();
return false;
});
});
var iframe = document.getElementById('postHere');
addEvent(iframe, 'load', function() {
uploadCount++;
if(uploadCount > 1) {
startUpload();
}
});
})();
HTML:
HTML:
<iframe src="test.htm" name="postHere" id="postHere"></iframe>
You don't need an inline event handler on the <iframe>
, it will still fire on each load with this code.
在
Regarding the load event
关于加载事件
Here is a test case demonstrating that you don't need an inline onload
event. This depends on referencing a file (/emptypage.php) on the same server, otherwise you should be able to just paste this into a page and run it.
这里有一个测试用例,说明您不需要内联onload事件。这取决于在同一台服务器上引用文件(/emptypage.php),否则您应该能够将其粘贴到页面中并运行它。
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<title>untitled</title>
</head>
<body>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
(function() {
var addEvent = function(element, type, method) {
if('addEventListener' in element) {
element.addEventListener(type, method, false);
} else if('attachEvent' in element) {
element.attachEvent('on' + type, method);
// If addEventListener and attachEvent are both unavailable,
// use inline events. This should never happen.
} else if('on' + type in element) {
// If a previous inline event exists, preserve it. This isn't
// tested, it may eat your baby
var oldMethod = element['on' + type],
newMethod = function(e) {
oldMethod(e);
newMethod(e);
};
} else {
element['on' + type] = method;
}
};
// Work around IE 6/7 bug where form submission targets
// a new window instead of the iframe. SO suggestion here:
// http://*.com/q/875650
var iframe;
try {
iframe = document.createElement('<iframe name="postHere">');
} catch (e) {
iframe = document.createElement('iframe');
iframe.name = 'postHere';
}
iframe.name = 'postHere';
iframe.id = 'postHere';
iframe.src = '/emptypage.php';
addEvent(iframe, 'load', function() {
alert('iframe load');
});
document.body.appendChild(iframe);
var form = document.createElement('form');
form.target = 'postHere';
form.action = '/emptypage.php';
var submit = document.createElement('input');
submit.type = 'submit';
submit.value = 'Submit';
form.appendChild(submit);
document.body.appendChild(form);
})();
</script>
</body>
</html>
The alert fires every time I click the submit button in Safari, Firefox, IE 6, 7 and 8.
每当我点击Safari、Firefox、IE 6、7和8中的submit按钮时,警报就会触发。
#2
51
I suggest the module pattern.
我建议使用模块模式。
YAHOO.myProject.myModule = function () {
//"private" variables:
var myPrivateVar = "I can be accessed only from within YAHOO.myProject.myModule.";
//"private" method:
var myPrivateMethod = function () {
YAHOO.log("I can be accessed only from within YAHOO.myProject.myModule");
}
return {
myPublicProperty: "I'm accessible as YAHOO.myProject.myModule.myPublicProperty."
myPublicMethod: function () {
YAHOO.log("I'm accessible as YAHOO.myProject.myModule.myPublicMethod.");
//Within myProject, I can access "private" vars and methods:
YAHOO.log(myPrivateVar);
YAHOO.log(myPrivateMethod());
//The native scope of myPublicMethod is myProject; we can
//access public members using "this":
YAHOO.log(this.myPublicProperty);
}
};
}(); // the parens here cause the anonymous function to execute and return
#3
7
First off, it is impossible to avoid global JavaScript, something will always be dangling the global scope. Even if you create a namespace, which is still a good idea, that namespace will be global.
首先,要避免全局JavaScript是不可能的,总会有一些东西在全局范围中摇摆不定。即使您创建了一个名称空间(这仍然是一个好主意),该名称空间也将是全局的。
There are many approaches, however, to not abuse the global scope. Two of the simplest are to either use closure, or since you only have one variable you need to keep track of, just set it as a property of the function itself (which can then be treated as a static
variable).
然而,有许多方法可以避免滥用全球范围。最简单的两种方法是使用闭包,或者由于您只需要跟踪一个变量,只需将其设置为函数本身的属性(然后可以将其视为静态变量)。
Closure
var startUpload = (function() {
var uploadCount = 1; // <----
return function() {
var fil = document.getElementById("FileUpload" + uploadCount++); // <----
if(!fil || fil.value.length == 0) {
alert("Finished!");
document.forms[0].reset();
uploadCount = 1; // <----
return;
}
disableAllFileInputs();
fil.disabled = false;
alert("Uploading file " + uploadCount);
document.forms[0].submit();
};
})();
* Note that incrementing of uploadCount
is happening internally here
注意,uploadCount的递增是在内部发生的
Function Property
var startUpload = function() {
startUpload.uploadCount = startUpload.count || 1; // <----
var fil = document.getElementById("FileUpload" + startUpload.count++);
if(!fil || fil.value.length == 0) {
alert("Finished!");
document.forms[0].reset();
startUpload.count = 1; // <----
return;
}
disableAllFileInputs();
fil.disabled = false;
alert("Uploading file " + startUpload.count);
document.forms[0].submit();
};
I'm not sure why uploadCount++; if(uploadCount > 1) ...
is necessary, as it looks like the condition will always be true. But if you do need global access to the variable, then the function property method I described above will allow you to do so without the variable actually being global.
我不知道为什么是uploadCount++;如果(uploadCount > 1)……这是必要的,因为它看起来是真实的。但是如果您确实需要对变量进行全局访问,那么我上面描述的函数属性方法将允许您这样做,而不需要变量实际上是全局的。
<iframe src="test.htm" name="postHere" id="postHere"
onload="startUpload.count++; if (startUpload.count > 1) startUpload();"></iframe>
However, if that's the case, then you should probably use an object literal or instantiated object and go about this in the normal OO way (where you can use the module pattern if it strikes your fancy).
但是,如果是这样,那么您可能应该使用对象文字或实例化对象,并使用常规的OO方式(如果符合您的要求,您可以使用模块模式)。
#4
4
window.onload = function() {
var frm = document.forms[0];
frm.target = "postMe";
frm.onsubmit = function() {
frm.onsubmit = null;
var uploader = new LazyFileUploader();
uploader.startUpload();
return false;
}
}
function LazyFileUploader() {
var uploadCount = 0;
var total = 10;
var prefix = "FileUpload";
var upload = function() {
var fil = document.getElementById(prefix + uploadCount);
if(!fil || fil.value.length == 0) {
alert("Finished!");
document.forms[0].reset();
return;
}
disableAllFileInputs();
fil.disabled = false;
alert("Uploading file " + uploadCount);
document.forms[0].submit();
uploadCount++;
if (uploadCount < total) {
setTimeout(function() {
upload();
}, 100);
}
}
this.startUpload = function() {
setTimeout(function() {
upload();
}, 100);
}
}
#5
3
Sometimes it makes sense to have global variables in JavaScript. But don't leave them hanging directly off window like that.
有时在JavaScript中使用全局变量是有意义的。但不要让它们像那样直接挂在窗外。
Instead, create a single "namespace" object to contain your globals. For bonus points, put everything in there, including your methods.
相反,创建一个“名称空间”对象来包含全局变量。为了奖励积分,把所有东西都放进去,包括你的方法。
#6
1
Some things are going to be in the global namespace -- namely, whatever function you're calling from your inline JavaScript code.
有些东西将会出现在全局命名空间中——也就是说,无论您从内联JavaScript代码中调用的函数是什么。
In general, the solution is to wrap everything in a closure:
一般来说,解决方案是把所有东西都包在一个闭包里:
(function() {
var uploadCount = 0;
function startupload() { ... }
document.getElementById('postHere').onload = function() {
uploadCount ++;
if (uploadCount > 1) startUpload();
};
})();
and avoid the inline handler.
避免使用内联处理程序。
#7
1
Using closures might be OK for small to medium projects. However, for big projects, you might want to split your code into modules and save them in different files.
对于中小型项目,使用闭包可能是可行的。但是,对于大型项目,您可能希望将代码分割为模块,并将它们保存到不同的文件中。
Therefore I wrote jQuery Secret plugin to solve the problem.
所以我写了jQuery Secret插件来解决这个问题。
In your case with this plugin the code would look something like the following.
在这个插件中,代码应该如下所示。
JavaScript:
// Initialize uploadCount.
$.secret( 'in', 'uploadCount', 0 ).
// Store function disableAllFileInputs.
secret( 'in', 'disableAllFileInputs', function(){
// Code for 'disable all file inputs' goes here.
// Store function startUpload
}).secret( 'in', 'startUpload', function(){
// 'this' points to the private object in $.secret
// where stores all the variables and functions
// ex. uploadCount, disableAllFileInputs, startUpload.
var fil = document.getElementById( 'FileUpload' + uploadCount);
if(!fil || fil.value.length == 0) {
alert( 'Finished!' );
document.forms[0].reset();
return;
}
// Use the stored disableAllFileInputs function
// or you can use $.secret( 'call', 'disableAllFileInputs' );
// it's the same thing.
this.disableAllFileInputs();
fil.disabled = false;
// this.uploadCount is equal to $.secret( 'out', 'uploadCount' );
alert( 'Uploading file ' + this.uploadCount );
document.forms[0].submit();
// Store function iframeOnload
}).secret( 'in', 'iframeOnload', function(){
this.uploadCount++;
if( this.uploadCount > 1 ) this.startUpload();
});
window.onload = function() {
var frm = document.forms[0];
frm.target = "postMe";
frm.onsubmit = function() {
// Call out startUpload function onsubmit
$.secret( 'call', 'startUpload' );
return false;
}
}
Relevant markup:
<iframe src="test.htm" name="postHere" id="postHere" onload="$.secret( 'call', 'iframeOnload' );"></iframe>
Open your Firebug, you will find no globals at all, not even the funciton :)
打开您的Firebug,您将发现根本没有全局变量,甚至连函数都没有:)
For full documentation, please see here.
For a demo page, please see this.
Source code on GitHub.
#8
1
Other way to do this is to create an object and then add methods to it.
另一种方法是创建一个对象,然后向其添加方法。
var object = {
a = 21,
b = 51
};
object.displayA = function() {
console.log(object.a);
};
object.displayB = function() {
console.log(object.b);
};
In this way, only object 'obj' is exposed and methods attached to it. It is equivalent to adding it in namespace.
通过这种方式,只公开对象“obj”和附加的方法。它等价于在命名空间中添加它。
#9
0
Use closures. Something like this gives you a scope other than global.
使用闭包。像这样的东西会给你一个范围以外的范围。
(function() {
// Your code here
var var1;
function f1() {
if(var1){...}
}
window.var_name = something; //<- if you have to have global var
window.glob_func = function(){...} //<- ...or global function
})();
#10
0
For "securing" induvidual global variables:
对于“保护”相关全局变量:
function gInitUploadCount() {
var uploadCount = 0;
gGetUploadCount = function () {
return uploadCount;
}
gAddUploadCount= function () {
uploadCount +=1;
}
}
gInitUploadCount();
gAddUploadCount();
console.log("Upload counter = "+gGetUploadCount());
I'm a novice to JS, currently using this in one project. (i apreciate any comment and criticism)
我是JS的新手,目前在一个项目中使用这个。(我收到任何评论和批评)