Why on sites like Stack Overflow, Techcrunch, Smashingmagazine, etc. are the page titles (i.e. the text at the top of the page) clickable URLs that redirect to the same page that the user is on?
为什么在Stack Overflow,Techcrunch,Smashingmagazine等网站上的页面标题(即页面顶部的文本)可点击的网址会重定向到用户所在的同一页面?
Some examples:
http://www.shog9.com/title-links.png
I believe that this does not effect SEO as search engines ignore internal links.
我认为这不会影响SEO,因为搜索引擎会忽略内部链接。
Is it for usability purposes?
它是出于可用性目的吗?
10 个解决方案
#1
More than anything, it provides a link to the default state of the page.
最重要的是,它提供了指向页面默认状态的链接。
For example, for this very stack overflow page it is a user can get here through any of the following non-default links:
例如,对于这个非常堆栈溢出页面,用户可以通过以下任何非默认链接到达此处:
- Why are Page Titles on some websites (including Stack Overflow) Clickable URLs?
- https://*.com/questions/904381#foobar
- https://*.com/questions/904381?sort=date
为什么某些网站上的网页标题(包括Stack Overflow)可点击的网址?
While the default link is actually:
虽然默认链接实际上是:
- Why are Page Titles on some websites (including Stack Overflow) Clickable URLs?
为什么某些网站上的网页标题(包括Stack Overflow)可点击的网址?
If users are unable to get to the default state, they end up bookmarking or emailing the non-default link which propagates to new users and the problem just multiplies.
如果用户无法进入默认状态,他们最终会将标签或电子邮件发送给传播给新用户的非默认链接,问题就会成倍增加。
Clicking on the title link of the post will restore the default state and strip off any query parameters (?sort=date), named anchors (#foobar) and fix the story slug (/why-are-page-titles/...).
点击帖子的标题链接将恢复默认状态并剥离任何查询参数(?sort = date),命名锚点(#foobar)并修复故事slug(/ why-are-page-titles / ... )。
#2
It allows you to right-click on it and choose Copy link location (or equivalent) so that you can easily paste it in an email for example. This requires less time than copying it from the location bar, and some people run their browser without a visible location bar to save previous screen space.
它允许您右键单击它并选择复制链接位置(或等效的),以便您可以轻松地将其粘贴到电子邮件中。这比从位置栏复制它所需的时间更少,并且有些人在没有可见位置栏的情况下运行浏览器以保存先前的屏幕空间。
#3
I use it to refresh the page (yes, I could press F5 too).
我用它来刷新页面(是的,我也可以按F5)。
#4
Yes Jakob Nielsen has stated that linking to yourself is a web design mistake (nr 10). And I agree.
是的Jakob Nielsen表示,链接到自己是一个网页设计错误(10号)。并且我同意。
More reading info here. (nr 10)
更多阅读信息在这里。 (10号)
#5
The URL redirects to the beginning of the page, in case you arrived on the page via a specific answer (all answers are also clickable URLs). This way, you get the URL of the question, not of an answer.
如果您通过特定答案到达页面,则URL会重定向到页面的开头(所有答案都是可点击的URL)。这样,您就可以获得问题的URL,而不是答案。
#6
Not sure if this is why they did it, but I find it useful to siphon off tabs:
不确定这是否是他们这样做的原因,但我发现吸掉标签很有用:
If I look at something briefly and think "I'd like to read this thoroughly in a minute but continue with what I was doing before", I can do this:
如果我简单地看一下并想“我想在一分钟内彻底阅读这篇文章,但继续我以前做过的事情”,我可以这样做:
I can right click the link, click "open in a new tab" and then click "back" and continue nicely.
我可以右键单击该链接,单击“在新选项卡中打开”,然后单击“返回”并继续。
#7
It's called a Permalink... The name implies what it is, a permanent link.
它被称为固定链接...这个名称暗示它是什么,永久链接。
It's the same reason that each answer on SO has a link you can copy.
这与SO上的每个答案都有一个可以复制的链接的原因相同。
#8
I think it inherits the behavior from CMS where each question is a node, which has 0<= answered question. Now think you go for a search on apache questions. The result are displayed one after another. In terms of CMS this is called a teaser. You get a full page with lots of questions where the question's title link to the full article(question + answers)
我认为它继承了CMS的行为,其中每个问题都是一个节点,其中有0 <=已回答的问题。现在想想你去搜索apache问题。结果一个接一个地显示。就CMS而言,这称为预告片。你会得到一个包含很多问题的完整页面,问题的标题链接到完整的文章(问题+答案)
Its not a must, but you'll find it on most sites which uses a CMS.
它不是必须的,但你会在大多数使用CMS的网站上找到它。
#9
As long as it does not harm anyone why would people be against it?
只要不伤害任何人,为什么人们会反对呢?
I prefer to have those links available as hitting refresh would reload all elements of the page instead of just following the direct link (to the same page) that uses cached elements.
我更喜欢让这些链接可用,因为点击刷新会重新加载页面的所有元素,而不是仅仅跟随使用缓存元素的直接链接(到同一页面)。
#10
Makes sense to me, I find it useful! I have a lot of tabs open so I just right click the link and go back.
对我有意义,我发现它很有用!我打开了很多标签,所以我只需点击链接然后返回即可。
To me this makes perfect sense, from a SEO view this is also good! It forces it to read the page because it's linked.
对我来说这很有道理,从SEO看来这也很好!它强制它读取页面,因为它是链接的。
#1
More than anything, it provides a link to the default state of the page.
最重要的是,它提供了指向页面默认状态的链接。
For example, for this very stack overflow page it is a user can get here through any of the following non-default links:
例如,对于这个非常堆栈溢出页面,用户可以通过以下任何非默认链接到达此处:
- Why are Page Titles on some websites (including Stack Overflow) Clickable URLs?
- https://*.com/questions/904381#foobar
- https://*.com/questions/904381?sort=date
为什么某些网站上的网页标题(包括Stack Overflow)可点击的网址?
While the default link is actually:
虽然默认链接实际上是:
- Why are Page Titles on some websites (including Stack Overflow) Clickable URLs?
为什么某些网站上的网页标题(包括Stack Overflow)可点击的网址?
If users are unable to get to the default state, they end up bookmarking or emailing the non-default link which propagates to new users and the problem just multiplies.
如果用户无法进入默认状态,他们最终会将标签或电子邮件发送给传播给新用户的非默认链接,问题就会成倍增加。
Clicking on the title link of the post will restore the default state and strip off any query parameters (?sort=date), named anchors (#foobar) and fix the story slug (/why-are-page-titles/...).
点击帖子的标题链接将恢复默认状态并剥离任何查询参数(?sort = date),命名锚点(#foobar)并修复故事slug(/ why-are-page-titles / ... )。
#2
It allows you to right-click on it and choose Copy link location (or equivalent) so that you can easily paste it in an email for example. This requires less time than copying it from the location bar, and some people run their browser without a visible location bar to save previous screen space.
它允许您右键单击它并选择复制链接位置(或等效的),以便您可以轻松地将其粘贴到电子邮件中。这比从位置栏复制它所需的时间更少,并且有些人在没有可见位置栏的情况下运行浏览器以保存先前的屏幕空间。
#3
I use it to refresh the page (yes, I could press F5 too).
我用它来刷新页面(是的,我也可以按F5)。
#4
Yes Jakob Nielsen has stated that linking to yourself is a web design mistake (nr 10). And I agree.
是的Jakob Nielsen表示,链接到自己是一个网页设计错误(10号)。并且我同意。
More reading info here. (nr 10)
更多阅读信息在这里。 (10号)
#5
The URL redirects to the beginning of the page, in case you arrived on the page via a specific answer (all answers are also clickable URLs). This way, you get the URL of the question, not of an answer.
如果您通过特定答案到达页面,则URL会重定向到页面的开头(所有答案都是可点击的URL)。这样,您就可以获得问题的URL,而不是答案。
#6
Not sure if this is why they did it, but I find it useful to siphon off tabs:
不确定这是否是他们这样做的原因,但我发现吸掉标签很有用:
If I look at something briefly and think "I'd like to read this thoroughly in a minute but continue with what I was doing before", I can do this:
如果我简单地看一下并想“我想在一分钟内彻底阅读这篇文章,但继续我以前做过的事情”,我可以这样做:
I can right click the link, click "open in a new tab" and then click "back" and continue nicely.
我可以右键单击该链接,单击“在新选项卡中打开”,然后单击“返回”并继续。
#7
It's called a Permalink... The name implies what it is, a permanent link.
它被称为固定链接...这个名称暗示它是什么,永久链接。
It's the same reason that each answer on SO has a link you can copy.
这与SO上的每个答案都有一个可以复制的链接的原因相同。
#8
I think it inherits the behavior from CMS where each question is a node, which has 0<= answered question. Now think you go for a search on apache questions. The result are displayed one after another. In terms of CMS this is called a teaser. You get a full page with lots of questions where the question's title link to the full article(question + answers)
我认为它继承了CMS的行为,其中每个问题都是一个节点,其中有0 <=已回答的问题。现在想想你去搜索apache问题。结果一个接一个地显示。就CMS而言,这称为预告片。你会得到一个包含很多问题的完整页面,问题的标题链接到完整的文章(问题+答案)
Its not a must, but you'll find it on most sites which uses a CMS.
它不是必须的,但你会在大多数使用CMS的网站上找到它。
#9
As long as it does not harm anyone why would people be against it?
只要不伤害任何人,为什么人们会反对呢?
I prefer to have those links available as hitting refresh would reload all elements of the page instead of just following the direct link (to the same page) that uses cached elements.
我更喜欢让这些链接可用,因为点击刷新会重新加载页面的所有元素,而不是仅仅跟随使用缓存元素的直接链接(到同一页面)。
#10
Makes sense to me, I find it useful! I have a lot of tabs open so I just right click the link and go back.
对我有意义,我发现它很有用!我打开了很多标签,所以我只需点击链接然后返回即可。
To me this makes perfect sense, from a SEO view this is also good! It forces it to read the page because it's linked.
对我来说这很有道理,从SEO看来这也很好!它强制它读取页面,因为它是链接的。