Could not find the difference between these two.
Does this make sense to keep any of these to bootstrap my angular app?
找不到这两者之间的区别。将这些中的任何一个引导到我的角度应用程序是否有意义?
angular.bootstrap(document,['myApp']);
or
angularAMD.bootstrap(app);
1 个解决方案
#1
1
angularAMD
is an utility that facilitates the use of RequireJS in AngularJS applications supporting on-demand loading of 3rd party modules such as angular-ui
.
angularAMD是一个实用程序,它有助于在AngularJS应用程序中使用RequireJS,支持按需加载第三方模块,如angular-ui。
And this module provides you
这个模块为您提供
define(['angularAMD'], function (angularAMD) {
var app = angular.module(app_name, ['webapp']);
... // Setup app here. E.g.: run .config with $routeProvider
return angularAMD.bootstrap(app);
});
Where as angular.bootstrap(document,['myApp']);
link is in build angular method to boostrap application.
在哪里作为angular.bootstrap(document,['myApp']); link是建立角度方法到boostrap应用程序。
Use any of it but stick with one only.
使用其中任何一个但只坚持一个。
#1
1
angularAMD
is an utility that facilitates the use of RequireJS in AngularJS applications supporting on-demand loading of 3rd party modules such as angular-ui
.
angularAMD是一个实用程序,它有助于在AngularJS应用程序中使用RequireJS,支持按需加载第三方模块,如angular-ui。
And this module provides you
这个模块为您提供
define(['angularAMD'], function (angularAMD) {
var app = angular.module(app_name, ['webapp']);
... // Setup app here. E.g.: run .config with $routeProvider
return angularAMD.bootstrap(app);
});
Where as angular.bootstrap(document,['myApp']);
link is in build angular method to boostrap application.
在哪里作为angular.bootstrap(document,['myApp']); link是建立角度方法到boostrap应用程序。
Use any of it but stick with one only.
使用其中任何一个但只坚持一个。