rowlock release problem with thread interruptions in batchMutate
在region server的log中有大量的WARN日志:
WARN org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion: Failed getting lock in batch put,
row=0001558252
搜索关键字"Failed getting lock in batch put"整个hbase代码中只有一个地方出现了这个关键字
1.HRegionServer#multi()接收到multi操作,找到某个region对其操作
这里会创建mutation操作,和对应的锁,锁是用RowLock获得的,默认锁id是-1,如果是-1则返回null,这样构造出的Pair对的first就是mutation,second就是null了,再将构造好的值传给HRegion#batchMutate()处理
- List<Pair<Mutation,Integer>> mutationsWithLocks =
- Lists.newArrayListWithCapacity(mutations.size());
- for (Action<R> a : mutations) {
- Mutation m = (Mutation) a.getAction();
- Integer lock;
- try {
- lock = getLockFromId(m.getLockId());
- } catch (UnknownRowLockException ex) {
- response.add(regionName, a.getOriginalIndex(), ex);
- continue;
- }
- mutationsWithLocks.add(new Pair<Mutation, Integer>(m, lock));
- }
- this.requestCount.addAndGet(mutations.size());
- OperationStatus[] codes =
- region.batchMutate(mutationsWithLocks.toArray(new Pair[]{}));
2.HRegion#batchMutate()再调用HRegion#doMiniBatchMutation()
这个函数很长,第一步是批量获得锁操作
- while (lastIndexExclusive < batchOp.operations.length) {
- boolean shouldBlock = numReadyToWrite == 0;
- Integer acquiredLockId = null;
- try {
- acquiredLockId = getLock(providedLockId, mutation.getRow(),
- shouldBlock);
- } catch (IOException ioe) {
- LOG.warn("Failed getting lock in batch put, row="
- + Bytes.toStringBinary(mutation.getRow()), ioe);
- }
- ....
- }
3.HRegion#getLock()函数是一个分支,通过debug来看,走的是if,因为lockid是null,在第一步里面有说明
- public Integer getLock(Integer lockid, byte [] row, boolean waitForLock)
- throws IOException {
- Integer lid = null;
- if (lockid == null) {
- lid = internalObtainRowLock(row, waitForLock);
- } else {
- if (!isRowLocked(lockid)) {
- throw new IOException("Invalid row lock");
- }
- lid = lockid;
- }
- return lid;
- }
4.最后调用HRegion#internalObtainRowLock(final byte[] row, boolean waitForLock)
- while (true) {
- CountDownLatch existingLatch = lockedRows.putIfAbsent(rowKey, rowLatch);
- if (existingLatch == null) {
- break;
- } else {
- // row already locked
- if (!waitForLock) {
- return null;
- }
- try {
- if (!existingLatch.await(this.rowLockWaitDuration,
- TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)) {
- throw new IOException("Timed out on getting lock for row="
- + Bytes.toStringBinary(row));
- }
- } catch (InterruptedException ie) {
- // Empty
- }
- }
- }
internalObtainRowLock()函数的开头会创建一个readLock(),在函数结束后会释放这个readLock()
lockedRows是一个ConcurrentHashMap,当第一次调用putIfAbsent()时候,由于map中还没有这个key,所以返回的CountDownLatch为null,于是直接返回了。
可以看到lockedRows的key就是rowkey,所有之前这个map中存在了相同的rowkey,但是没有被remove掉,之后又有请求要操作相同的key就会等待,如果等待30秒(rowLockWaitDuration值为30秒)则会抛出异常,之后向上抛被HRegion#batchMutate()捕获并打印日志,也就是日志中出现的 Failed getting lock in batch put
这个锁只对于Put和Delete操作,Get操作不受锁的影响
这个函数有一个waitForLock参数,如果为false,则不会等待直接返回
在第二步中有一个中有一个重试次数,如果不为0则传到internalObtainRowLock()函数时变量waitForLock就为false,但是不会做这个重试。而是直接返回了,所以每次再有新的请求时,都会用waitForLock=true去调用这个函数,所以也就阻塞了,而且HRegion#batchMutate()有一个循环判断,这个循环也没有退出来,也就不是不停的调用HRegion#doMiniBatchMutation(),不停的重试,获取锁。
如果锁住rowkey的这个进程卡主了或者其他原因导致lockedRows中一直有这个rowkey,那么这个重试循环就不会退出导致死循环,所以日志会会出现大量的Failed getting lock in batch put
WARN org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion: Failed getting lock in batch put, row=0001558252
这个是因为有一个Delete或Put操作,已经将rowkey锁住了,之后又有Delete或Put操作这个rowkey触发了一个CountDownLatch等待超时抛出的异常。
参考:
RegionServer stuck in internalObtainRowLock forever - HBase 0.94.7
How to improve my configuration of HBase version cdh4.4.0