I need a circular linked list, so I am wondering if LinkedList
is a circular linked list?
我需要一个循环链表,所以我想知道LinkedList是否是循环链表?
5 个解决方案
#1
14
No. It is a doubly linked list, but not a circular linked list. See MSDN for details on this.
不是。它是一个双向链表,但不是循环链表。有关详细信息,请参阅MSDN。
LinkedList<T> makes a good foundation for your own circular linked list, however. But it does have a definite First and Last property, and will not enumerate around these, which a proper circular linked list will.
然而,LinkedList
#2
48
A quick solution to using it in a circular fashion, whenever you want to move the "next" piece in the list:
无论何时您想要移动列表中的“下一个”部分,都可以快速解决以循环方式使用它的方法:
current = current.Next ?? current.List.First;
Where current is LinkedListNode<T>
.
其中current是LinkedListNode
#3
6
If you need a circular data structure, have a look at the C5 generic collections library. They have any collection that's imaginably useful in there, including a circular queue (which might help you).
如果需要循环数据结构,请查看C5泛型集合库。他们有任何在那里可以想象的有用的集合,包括一个循环队列(可能对你有帮助)。
#5
4
While the public API of the LinkedList is not circular, internally it actually is. Consulting the reference source, you can see how it's implemented:
虽然LinkedList的公共API不是循环的,但实际上它是内部的。咨询参考源,您可以看到它是如何实现的:
// This LinkedList is a doubly-Linked circular list.
internal LinkedListNode<T> head;
Of course, to hide the fact that it's circular, properties and methods that traverse the list make checks to prevent wrapping back to the head.
当然,为了隐藏它是循环的事实,遍历列表的属性和方法进行检查以防止回绕到头部。
LinkedListNode:
public LinkedListNode<T> Next {
get { return next == null || next == list.head? null: next;}
}
public LinkedListNode<T> Previous {
get { return prev == null || this == list.head? null: prev;}
}
LinkedList.Enumerator:
public bool MoveNext() {
if (version != list.version) {
throw new InvalidOperationException(SR.GetString(SR.InvalidOperation_EnumFailedVersion));
}
if (node == null) {
index = list.Count + 1;
return false;
}
++index;
current = node.item;
node = node.next;
if (node == list.head) {
node = null;
}
return true;
}
#1
14
No. It is a doubly linked list, but not a circular linked list. See MSDN for details on this.
不是。它是一个双向链表,但不是循环链表。有关详细信息,请参阅MSDN。
LinkedList<T> makes a good foundation for your own circular linked list, however. But it does have a definite First and Last property, and will not enumerate around these, which a proper circular linked list will.
然而,LinkedList
#2
48
A quick solution to using it in a circular fashion, whenever you want to move the "next" piece in the list:
无论何时您想要移动列表中的“下一个”部分,都可以快速解决以循环方式使用它的方法:
current = current.Next ?? current.List.First;
Where current is LinkedListNode<T>
.
其中current是LinkedListNode
#3
6
If you need a circular data structure, have a look at the C5 generic collections library. They have any collection that's imaginably useful in there, including a circular queue (which might help you).
如果需要循环数据结构,请查看C5泛型集合库。他们有任何在那里可以想象的有用的集合,包括一个循环队列(可能对你有帮助)。
#4
#5
4
While the public API of the LinkedList is not circular, internally it actually is. Consulting the reference source, you can see how it's implemented:
虽然LinkedList的公共API不是循环的,但实际上它是内部的。咨询参考源,您可以看到它是如何实现的:
// This LinkedList is a doubly-Linked circular list.
internal LinkedListNode<T> head;
Of course, to hide the fact that it's circular, properties and methods that traverse the list make checks to prevent wrapping back to the head.
当然,为了隐藏它是循环的事实,遍历列表的属性和方法进行检查以防止回绕到头部。
LinkedListNode:
public LinkedListNode<T> Next {
get { return next == null || next == list.head? null: next;}
}
public LinkedListNode<T> Previous {
get { return prev == null || this == list.head? null: prev;}
}
LinkedList.Enumerator:
public bool MoveNext() {
if (version != list.version) {
throw new InvalidOperationException(SR.GetString(SR.InvalidOperation_EnumFailedVersion));
}
if (node == null) {
index = list.Count + 1;
return false;
}
++index;
current = node.item;
node = node.next;
if (node == list.head) {
node = null;
}
return true;
}