I have a document in Markdown, which incorporates R code via Knitr
. For rendering equations I use LaTeX, simply writing its commands in the text. Say I have the following LaTeX code:
我在Markdown中有一个文档,它通过Knitr合并了R代码。对于渲染方程式,我使用LaTeX,只需在文本中编写命令即可。说我有以下LaTeX代码:
\begin{displaymath}
\mathbf{X} = \begin{bmatrix}
2 & 12\\
3 & 17\\
5 & 10\\
7 & 18\\
9 & 13\\
\end{bmatrix}
\end{displaymath}
Which renders me a nice mathematical matrix representation (in square brackets), when I convert everything to PDF (the full workflow is then: RMD -> knitr -> MD -> pandoc -> TeX -> pandoc -> PDF).
当我将所有内容转换为PDF(然后完整的工作流程:RMD - > knitr - > MD - > pandoc - > TeX - > pandoc - > PDF)时,这给我一个很好的数学矩阵表示(方括号)。
Now, suppose we want the said matrix to be generated on-the-fly from an R object, some R matrix x
. In this post we establish how to generate the required LaTeX code (the matrix2latex()
function is defined there). The question now is how to get Knitr
to evaluate it. I tried the following code:
现在,假设我们希望从R对象即一些R矩阵x即时生成所述矩阵。在这篇文章中,我们建立了如何生成所需的LaTeX代码(在那里定义了matrix2latex()函数)。现在的问题是如何让Knitr对其进行评估。我尝试了以下代码:
\begin{displaymath}
\mathbf{X} = `r matrix2latex(x)`
\end{displaymath}
but it simply produces blank space (NULL actually) where the R output should be. I am surprised this hasn't been asked already (at least my own search yielded nothing). Any ideas how to make this work?
但它只是产生R输出所在的空白区域(实际为NULL)。我很惊讶这已经没有被问过了(至少我自己的搜索没有产生任何结果)。任何想法如何使这项工作?
EDIT:
编辑:
As suggested, rewrote the function without cat()
. Here is the working version of the function for future reference:
正如所建议的,重写了没有cat()的函数。以下是该函数的工作版本以供将来参考:
m2l <- function(matr) {
printmrow <- function(x) {
ret <- paste(paste(x,collapse = " & "),"\\\\")
sprintf(ret)
}
out <- apply(matr,1,printmrow)
out2 <- paste("\\begin{bmatrix}",paste(out,collapse=' '),"\\end{bmatrix}")
return(out2)
}
1 个解决方案
#1
9
This is because your matrix2latex
function uses cat
and sends its output to the standard output stream, which isn't where knitr
is trying to put the output.
这是因为你的matrix2latex函数使用cat并将其输出发送到标准输出流,这不是knitr试图输出的地方。
Two solutions: one is to rewrite your function to construct the output as a string using paste
and sprintf
or other string formatting functions, or as a quick hack just wrap it in capture.output
thus:
两个解决方案:一个是重写你的函数,使用paste和sprintf或其他字符串格式化函数将输出构造为一个字符串,或者作为快速破解将它包装在capture.output中,这样:
m2l = function(matr){capture.output(matrix2latex(matr))}
Then in your .Rmd
file:
然后在.Rmd文件中:
\begin{displaymath}
\mathbf{X} = `r m2l(x)`
\end{displaymath}
becomes
变
\mathbf{X} = \begin{bmatrix} , 0.06099 & 0.768 \\ , 0.6112 & 0.004696 \\ , 0.02729 & 0.6198 \\ , 0.8498 & 0.3308 \\ , 0.6869 & 0.103 \\ , \end{bmatrix}
which although isn't quite perfect does illustrate the principle. The code inserted by the inline expression is the value of it, not what it prints or cats.
虽然不是很完美,但确实说明了原理。内联表达式插入的代码是它的值,而不是它打印的内容或猫。
#1
9
This is because your matrix2latex
function uses cat
and sends its output to the standard output stream, which isn't where knitr
is trying to put the output.
这是因为你的matrix2latex函数使用cat并将其输出发送到标准输出流,这不是knitr试图输出的地方。
Two solutions: one is to rewrite your function to construct the output as a string using paste
and sprintf
or other string formatting functions, or as a quick hack just wrap it in capture.output
thus:
两个解决方案:一个是重写你的函数,使用paste和sprintf或其他字符串格式化函数将输出构造为一个字符串,或者作为快速破解将它包装在capture.output中,这样:
m2l = function(matr){capture.output(matrix2latex(matr))}
Then in your .Rmd
file:
然后在.Rmd文件中:
\begin{displaymath}
\mathbf{X} = `r m2l(x)`
\end{displaymath}
becomes
变
\mathbf{X} = \begin{bmatrix} , 0.06099 & 0.768 \\ , 0.6112 & 0.004696 \\ , 0.02729 & 0.6198 \\ , 0.8498 & 0.3308 \\ , 0.6869 & 0.103 \\ , \end{bmatrix}
which although isn't quite perfect does illustrate the principle. The code inserted by the inline expression is the value of it, not what it prints or cats.
虽然不是很完美,但确实说明了原理。内联表达式插入的代码是它的值,而不是它打印的内容或猫。