I've got a class definition similar to the following:
我有一个类似于以下的类定义:
class UUID
{
public:
// Using implicit copy assignment operator
private:
unsigned char buffer[16];
};
I've just had a unit test fail on me that was verifying that copy assignment worked properly. To my surprise, one byte in the middle of the buffer[] array was copied incorrectly.
我刚刚对我进行了单元测试失败,验证了副本分配是否正常工作。令我惊讶的是,buffer []数组中间的一个字节被错误地复制了。
My understanding is that the default copy assignment operator performs memberwise copy, and that for array members (not pointer-to-array members) that entails elementwise copy of the array. Am I mistaken?
我的理解是默认的复制赋值操作符执行成员复制,而数组成员(不是指向数组的成员)则需要执行元素的元素复制。我错了吗?
My gut feeling here is that I've been bitten by a dangling pointer somewhere that has stomped on the middle of my array. But, I'm seeing this repeatably when, e.g. I copy a vector of these objects into another vector.
我在这里的直觉是,我被一个悬挂在我阵列中间的晃动指针咬了一下。但是,我正在重复地看到这种情况,例如,我将这些对象的矢量复制到另一个矢量中。
Anybody care to tell me where I've gone wrong?
有人想告诉我哪里出错了吗?
Edit:
编辑:
To expand on this a bit, the class is not a POD type--it derives from a few abstract base classes and thus has a virtual destructor. However, the array is the only data member, and the usage which broke in the unit test was this:
为了扩展这一点,该类不是POD类型 - 它派生自一些抽象基类,因此具有虚拟析构函数。但是,数组是唯一的数据成员,单元测试中的用法是这样的:
const int n = 100;
std::vector<UUID> src, dst;
src.reserve(n);
dst.resize(n);
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
UUID id;
src.push_back(id);
}
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
dst[i] = src[i];
}
bool good = true;
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
const bool thisGood = (dst[i] == src[i]);
std::cout << "i = " << i << " -> src = '" << src[i]
<< "', dst = '" << dst[i] << "', src == dst ? "
<< thisGood << '\n';
good = (good && thisGood);
}
1 个解决方案
#1
11
My understanding is that the default copy assignment operator performs memberwise copy, and that for array members (not pointer-to-array members) that entailed elementwise copy of the array.
我的理解是,默认的复制赋值运算符执行成员复制,而数组成员(不是指向数组的成员)则需要执行元素的元素复制。
Yes. This is correct.
是。这是对的。
Your problem is not with the copy assignment operator (unless you have found some unusual compiler bug, which is unlikely).
您的问题不在于复制赋值运算符(除非您发现了一些不常见的编译器错误,这是不太可能的)。
#1
11
My understanding is that the default copy assignment operator performs memberwise copy, and that for array members (not pointer-to-array members) that entailed elementwise copy of the array.
我的理解是,默认的复制赋值运算符执行成员复制,而数组成员(不是指向数组的成员)则需要执行元素的元素复制。
Yes. This is correct.
是。这是对的。
Your problem is not with the copy assignment operator (unless you have found some unusual compiler bug, which is unlikely).
您的问题不在于复制赋值运算符(除非您发现了一些不常见的编译器错误,这是不太可能的)。