This question already has an answer here:
这个问题在这里已有答案：
- what “inline __attribute__((always_inline))” means in the function? 2 answers
- 什么“内联__attribute __（（always_inline））”在函数中意味着什么？ 2个答案
If gcc get called with link time optimization (-flto) enabled and I am using one of the following keyword/attribute:
如果在启用链接时优化（-flto）的情况下调用gcc，并且我使用以下关键字/属性之一：
__attribute__((always_inline)) void foo(int i);
inline void bar(int i);
Does this keyword/attribute affect the behavior of the link-time optimization (If the compiler is not able to do the inlineing)?
此关键字/属性是否会影响链接时优化的行为（如果编译器无法进行内联）？
Does the link-time optimization prefer inlineing of these function over functions without this keyword/attribute.
链接时优化是否更喜欢在没有此关键字/属性的函数中内联这些函数。
The question is if it makes a difference for the linker-phase processing not the compiler.
问题是它是否对链接器阶段处理而不是编译器产生影响。
1 个解决方案
#1
2
Based on a previous answer found here: what “inline __attribute__((always_inline))” means in the function?
基于此前找到的答案：“inline __attribute __（（always_inline））”在函数中意味着什么？
__attribute__((always_inline))
makes the compiler try to inline it even if it's disabled in the preferences, and
使编译器尝试内联它，即使它在首选项中被禁用，并且
inline
tells the compiler to try really hard to inline the function.
告诉编译器真的很难内联函数。
#1
2
Based on a previous answer found here: what “inline __attribute__((always_inline))” means in the function?
基于此前找到的答案：“inline __attribute __（（always_inline））”在函数中意味着什么？
__attribute__((always_inline))
makes the compiler try to inline it even if it's disabled in the preferences, and
使编译器尝试内联它，即使它在首选项中被禁用，并且
inline
tells the compiler to try really hard to inline the function.
告诉编译器真的很难内联函数。