I'm trying to code a simple user-level thread library as an exercise for my OS course. As the first step, I am trying to run a program and jump to a function leaving the first program. The code so far is this:
我正在尝试编写一个简单的用户级线程库作为我的OS课程的练习。作为第一步,我试图运行一个程序并跳转到一个函数离开第一个程序。到目前为止的代码是这样的:
The initial program:
最初的计划:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <assert.h>
#define STACK_SIZE (sizeof(void *) * 512)
void proc2() //This is the function that should run as the thread.
{
int i;
for(i=0;i<30;i++)
{
printf("Here I am!\n");
sleep(0.5);
}
exit(0);
}
void* malloc_stack() //used to malloc the stack for the new thread.
{
void *ptr = malloc(STACK_SIZE + 16);
if (!ptr) return NULL;
ptr = (void *)(((unsigned long)ptr & (-1 << 4)) + 0x10); //size align
return ptr;
}
int main()
{
int *bp, *sp;
sp = malloc_stack();
bp = (int*) ((unsigned long)sp + STACK_SIZE);
proc1(&proc2,sp,bp); //the actual code that runs the thread. Written in assembly
assert(0);
}
And then I wrote a simple assembly code called proc1 that takes three arguments, pointer to a function (used as the instruction pointer), stack pointer and base pointer and replace the current registers with these values. The code I wrote is:
然后我编写了一个名为proc1的简单汇编代码,它接受三个参数,指向函数的指针(用作指令指针),堆栈指针和基指针,并用这些值替换当前寄存器。我写的代码是:
.globl proc1
proc1:
movq %rdx, %rbp #store the new base pointer
movq %rsi,%rsp #store the new stack pointer
jmp %rdi #jump to the new instruction pointer.
But when I run this code, what I get is a segmentation fault. Please help me to find the error here.
但是,当我运行此代码时,我得到的是分段错误。请帮我在这里找到错误。
Well it's working correctly when I ran it under GDB using the following commands:
当我使用以下命令在GDB下运行它时,它正常工作:
gcc -g test.c switch.s
gdb a.out
run
but when it rus alone as in ./a.out, it doesn't work!!!! Please help.
但是当它像./a.out一样单独使用时,它不起作用!!!!请帮忙。
Thanks in advance.
提前致谢。
2 个解决方案
#1
4
Try changing your code to include the assembly instructions directly in the C source as follow:
尝试更改代码以直接在C源代码中包含汇编指令,如下所示:
void proc1(void (*fun)(), int *sp, int *bp){
register int *sptr asm ("%rsi") = sp;
register int *bptr asm ("%rdx") = bp;
register void (*fptr)() asm ("%rdi") = fun;
asm (
"mov %rdx, %ebp\n"
"mov %rsi, %esp\n"
"jmp *%rdi\n"
);
}
The above code ensures that the parameters to proc1
are in the right registers (although your code seems to be correct wrt the abi). Note the *
in front of the jmp
argument, which my version of gnu as warned about when I first tried your code.
上面的代码确保proc1的参数在正确的寄存器中(尽管你的代码似乎与abi一致)。注意jmp参数前面的*,这是我第一次尝试你的代码时我的gnu版本所警告的。
With the above function, and code compiled with -g
you should be able to debug it properly (use the breakpoint
instruction on proc1
and info registers
to check the content of the cpu).
使用上面的函数和用-g编译的代码,你应该能够正确地调试它(使用proc1和info寄存器上的断点指令来检查cpu的内容)。
The issue is actually on the %rsp
pointer, which must always be equal to or greater than %rbp
(the stack grows downward). Simply passing bp instead of sp to proc1
in main should fix the issue:
问题实际上是在%rsp指针上,它必须始终等于或大于%rbp(堆栈向下增长)。只需将bp而不是sp传递给main中的proc1即可解决问题:
proc1(&proc2, bp, bp);
2 small remarks:
2个小言论:
-
don't forget to give
proc1
prototype in the C code for the asm version:不要忘记在asm版本的C代码中给出proc1原型:
extern void proc1(void (*)(), int *, int *);
-
the
sleep
libc function only takeunsigned long
, notfloat
.sleep libc函数只取无符号long,而不是float。
sleep(1);
#2
2
Your movq
at the top of your assembly are (well, "were" before you edited :-) ) written as
你的程序集顶部的movq是(好吧,编辑之前的“是”:-))写成
movq dst,src
but your movq
before the jmp
is written movq %rax,%rsp
and %rsp
is clearly the desired dst. That's obviously wrong, not sure about anything else.
但你在jmp之前的movq写的是movq%rax,%rsp和%rsp显然是所需的dst。这显然是错的,不确定其他任何事情。
#1
4
Try changing your code to include the assembly instructions directly in the C source as follow:
尝试更改代码以直接在C源代码中包含汇编指令,如下所示:
void proc1(void (*fun)(), int *sp, int *bp){
register int *sptr asm ("%rsi") = sp;
register int *bptr asm ("%rdx") = bp;
register void (*fptr)() asm ("%rdi") = fun;
asm (
"mov %rdx, %ebp\n"
"mov %rsi, %esp\n"
"jmp *%rdi\n"
);
}
The above code ensures that the parameters to proc1
are in the right registers (although your code seems to be correct wrt the abi). Note the *
in front of the jmp
argument, which my version of gnu as warned about when I first tried your code.
上面的代码确保proc1的参数在正确的寄存器中(尽管你的代码似乎与abi一致)。注意jmp参数前面的*,这是我第一次尝试你的代码时我的gnu版本所警告的。
With the above function, and code compiled with -g
you should be able to debug it properly (use the breakpoint
instruction on proc1
and info registers
to check the content of the cpu).
使用上面的函数和用-g编译的代码,你应该能够正确地调试它(使用proc1和info寄存器上的断点指令来检查cpu的内容)。
The issue is actually on the %rsp
pointer, which must always be equal to or greater than %rbp
(the stack grows downward). Simply passing bp instead of sp to proc1
in main should fix the issue:
问题实际上是在%rsp指针上,它必须始终等于或大于%rbp(堆栈向下增长)。只需将bp而不是sp传递给main中的proc1即可解决问题:
proc1(&proc2, bp, bp);
2 small remarks:
2个小言论:
-
don't forget to give
proc1
prototype in the C code for the asm version:不要忘记在asm版本的C代码中给出proc1原型:
extern void proc1(void (*)(), int *, int *);
-
the
sleep
libc function only takeunsigned long
, notfloat
.sleep libc函数只取无符号long,而不是float。
sleep(1);
#2
2
Your movq
at the top of your assembly are (well, "were" before you edited :-) ) written as
你的程序集顶部的movq是(好吧,编辑之前的“是”:-))写成
movq dst,src
but your movq
before the jmp
is written movq %rax,%rsp
and %rsp
is clearly the desired dst. That's obviously wrong, not sure about anything else.
但你在jmp之前的movq写的是movq%rax,%rsp和%rsp显然是所需的dst。这显然是错的,不确定其他任何事情。