I'm writing a method to generate a DataTable taking as datasource a generic IEnumerable. I am trying to set a default value on the field if theres no value, with the code below:
我正在编写一个方法,以一个通用的IEnumerable作为数据源生成一个DataTable。如果没有值,我尝试在字段上设置一个默认值,代码如下:
private void createTable<T>(IEnumerable<T> MyCollection, DataTable tabela)
{
Type tipo = typeof(T);
foreach (var item in tipo.GetFields() )
{
tabela.Columns.Add(new DataColumn(item.Name, item.FieldType));
}
foreach (Pessoa recordOnEnumerable in ListaPessoa.listaPessoas)
{
DataRow linha = tabela.NewRow();
foreach (FieldInfo itemField in tipo.GetFields())
{
Type typeAux = itemField.GetType();
linha[itemField.Name] =
itemField.GetValue(recordOnEnumerable) ?? default(typeAux);
}
}
}
It's throwing this error:
把这个错误:
The type or namespace name 'typeAux', could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)
无法找到类型或名称空间名称“typeAux”(是否缺少使用指令或程序集引用?)
Why? Shouldn't the function "Default(Type)" return a default value for that type?
为什么?函数“Default(Type)”不应该为该类型返回一个默认值吗?
2 个解决方案
#1
1
How about returning null for reference types and Activator.CreateInstance for value types
如何为引用类型和激活器返回null。CreateInstance除外的值类型
public static object GetDefault(Type type)
{
if(type.IsValueType)
{
return Activator.CreateInstance(type);
}
return null;
}
Reference: Programmatic equivalent of default(Type)
引用:默认的编程等效项(类型)
#2
0
The default
statement doesn't work with System.Type
.
默认语句不适用于System.Type。
That being said, it seems more appropriate to leave that out, and use DBNull
directly:
话虽如此,似乎还是应该把它排除在外,直接使用DBNull:
linha[itemField.Name] = itemField.GetValue(recordOnEnumerable) ?? DBNull.Value;
If the value is null
, setting the result to null
(which, in a DataRow
, is DBNull.Value
) seems appropriate.
如果值为null,那么将结果设置为null(在DataRow中,这个值是DBNull.Value)似乎是合适的。
#1
1
How about returning null for reference types and Activator.CreateInstance for value types
如何为引用类型和激活器返回null。CreateInstance除外的值类型
public static object GetDefault(Type type)
{
if(type.IsValueType)
{
return Activator.CreateInstance(type);
}
return null;
}
Reference: Programmatic equivalent of default(Type)
引用:默认的编程等效项(类型)
#2
0
The default
statement doesn't work with System.Type
.
默认语句不适用于System.Type。
That being said, it seems more appropriate to leave that out, and use DBNull
directly:
话虽如此,似乎还是应该把它排除在外,直接使用DBNull:
linha[itemField.Name] = itemField.GetValue(recordOnEnumerable) ?? DBNull.Value;
If the value is null
, setting the result to null
(which, in a DataRow
, is DBNull.Value
) seems appropriate.
如果值为null,那么将结果设置为null(在DataRow中,这个值是DBNull.Value)似乎是合适的。