I am trying to understand the difference between these two approaches of mocking a method. Could someone please help distinguish them? For this example, I use the passlib library.
我试图理解这两种模拟方法的方法之间的区别。有人可以帮助区分它们吗?对于此示例,我使用passlib库。
from passlib.context import CryptContext
from unittest import mock
with mock.patch.object(CryptContext, 'verify', return_value=True) as foo1:
mycc = CryptContext(schemes='bcrypt_sha256')
mypass = mycc.encrypt('test')
assert mycc.verify('tesssst', mypass)
with mock.patch('passlib.context.CryptContext.verify', return_value=True) as foo2:
mycc = CryptContext(schemes='bcrypt_sha256')
mypass = mycc.encrypt('test')
assert mycc.verify('tesssst', mypass)
1 个解决方案
#1
50
You already discovered the difference; mock.patch()
takes a string which will be resolved to an object when applying the patch, mock.patch.object()
takes a direct reference.
你已经发现了差异; mock.patch()接受一个字符串,在应用补丁时将解析为一个对象,mock.patch.object()接受直接引用。
This means that mock.patch()
doesn't require that you import the object before patching, while mock.patch.object()
does require that you import before patching.
这意味着mock.patch()不需要在修补之前导入对象,而mock.patch.object()确实要求在修补之前导入。
The latter is then easier to use if you already have a reference to the object.
如果您已经有对象的引用,那么后者更容易使用。
#1
50
You already discovered the difference; mock.patch()
takes a string which will be resolved to an object when applying the patch, mock.patch.object()
takes a direct reference.
你已经发现了差异; mock.patch()接受一个字符串,在应用补丁时将解析为一个对象,mock.patch.object()接受直接引用。
This means that mock.patch()
doesn't require that you import the object before patching, while mock.patch.object()
does require that you import before patching.
这意味着mock.patch()不需要在修补之前导入对象,而mock.patch.object()确实要求在修补之前导入。
The latter is then easier to use if you already have a reference to the object.
如果您已经有对象的引用,那么后者更容易使用。