Given this XML data:
鉴于这个XML数据:
<root> <item>apple</item> <item>orange</item> <item>banana</item> </root>
I can use this XSLT markup:
我可以使用这个XSLT标记:
... <xsl:for-each select="root/item"> <xsl:value-of select="."/>, </xsl:for-each> ...
to get this result:
得到结果:
apple, orange, banana,
but how do I produce a list where the last comma is not present? I assume it can be done doing something along the lines of:
但是如何生成一个没有最后一个逗号的列表呢?我认为它可以做一些类似的事情:
... <xsl:for-each select="root/item"> <xsl:value-of select="."/> <xsl:if test="...">,</xsl:if> </xsl:for-each> ...
but what should the test expression be?
但是,测试表达式应该是什么呢?
I need some way to figure out how long the list is and where I currently am in the list, or, alternatively, if I am currently processing the last element in the list (which means I don't care how long it is or what the current position is).
我需要某种方法来计算列表的长度和我当前在列表中的位置,或者,如果我正在处理列表中的最后一个元素(这意味着我不关心列表的长度或当前位置)。
7 个解决方案
#1
25
Take a look at the position()
, count()
and last()
functions; e.g., test="position() < last()"
.
查看position()、count()和last()函数;例如,测试= "位置()& lt;最后()”。
#2
50
This is a pretty common pattern:
这是一个很常见的模式:
<xsl:for-each select="*">
<xsl:value-of select="."/>
<xsl:if test="position() != last()">
<xsl:text>,</xsl:text>
</xsl:if>
</xsl:for-each>
#3
11
For an XSLT 2.0 option, you can use the separator
attribute on xsl:value-of
.
对于XSLT 2.0选项,可以使用xsl:value-of上的分隔符属性。
This xsl:value-of
:
这个xsl:作用是:
<xsl:value-of select="/root/item" separator=", "/>
would produce this output:
会产生该输出:
apple, orange, banana
You could also use more than just a comma for a separator. For example, this:
您还可以对分隔符使用不止一个逗号。例如,这个:
<xsl:text>'</xsl:text>
<xsl:value-of select="/root/item" separator="', '"/>
<xsl:text>'</xsl:text>
Would produce the following output:
将产生以下输出:
'apple', 'orange', 'banana'
Another XSLT 2.0 option is string-join()
...
另一个XSLT 2.0选项是string-join()……
<xsl:value-of select="string-join(/*/item,', ')"/>
#4
9
<xsl:if test="following-sibling::*">,</xsl:if>
or (perhaps more efficient, but you'd have to test):
或者(也许效率更高,但你必须进行测试):
<xsl:for-each select="*[1]">
<xsl:value-of select="."/>
<xsl:for-each select="following-sibling::*">
<xsl:value-of select="concat(',',.)"/>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:for-each>
#5
7
Robert gave the classis not(position() = last())
answer. This requires you to process the whole current node list to get context size, and in large input documents this might make the conversion consume more memory. Therefore, I normally invert the test to be the first thing
罗伯特给了班上的学生不及格的答案。这需要您处理整个当前节点列表以获得上下文大小,在大型输入文档中,这可能会使转换消耗更多的内存。因此,我通常把测试反演成第一件事
<xsl:for-each select="*">
<xsl:if test="not(position() = 1)>, </xsl:if>
<xsl:value-of select="."/>
</xsl:for-each>
#6
6
A simple XPath 1.0 one-liner:
简单的XPath 1.0一行代码:
concat(., substring(',', 2 - (position() != last())))
concat()。,子字符串(',',2 - (position() != last()))))
Put it into this transformation:
将其转化为:
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:output method="text"/>
<xsl:template match="/*">
<xsl:for-each select="*">
<xsl:value-of select=
"concat(., substring(',', 2 - (position() != last())))"
/>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
and apply it to the XML document:
并将其应用于XML文档:
<root>
<item>apple</item>
<item>orange</item>
<item>banana</item>
</root>
to get the wanted result:
要得到想要的结果:
apple,orange,banana
苹果,橘子,香蕉
EDIT:
编辑:
Here is a comment from Robert Rossney to this answer:
以下是罗伯特·罗斯尼对这个答案的评论:
That's pretty opaque code for a human to read. It requires you to know two non-obvious things about XSLT: 1) what the substring function does if its index is out of range and 2) that logical values can be implicitly converted to numerical ones.
对于人类来说,这是相当不透明的代码。它要求您了解关于XSLT的两件不明显的事情:1)如果子字符串函数的索引超出范围,它做什么;2)逻辑值可以隐式地转换为数值。
and here is my answer:
我的回答是:
Guys, never shy from learning something new. In fact this is all Stack Overflow is about, isn't it? :)
伙计们,不要羞于学习新东西。实际上这就是所有的堆栈溢出,不是吗?:)
#7
2
This is the way I got it working for me. I tested this against your list:
这就是我让它为我工作的方式。我测试了你的列表:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:output method="text" />
<xsl:template match="root">
<xsl:call-template name="comma-join"><xsl:with-param name="list" select="item"/></xsl:call-template>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template name="comma-join">
<xsl:param name="list" />
<xsl:for-each select="$list">
<xsl:value-of select="." />
<xsl:if test="position() != last()">
<xsl:text>, </xsl:text>
</xsl:if>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
#1
25
Take a look at the position()
, count()
and last()
functions; e.g., test="position() < last()"
.
查看position()、count()和last()函数;例如,测试= "位置()& lt;最后()”。
#2
50
This is a pretty common pattern:
这是一个很常见的模式:
<xsl:for-each select="*">
<xsl:value-of select="."/>
<xsl:if test="position() != last()">
<xsl:text>,</xsl:text>
</xsl:if>
</xsl:for-each>
#3
11
For an XSLT 2.0 option, you can use the separator
attribute on xsl:value-of
.
对于XSLT 2.0选项,可以使用xsl:value-of上的分隔符属性。
This xsl:value-of
:
这个xsl:作用是:
<xsl:value-of select="/root/item" separator=", "/>
would produce this output:
会产生该输出:
apple, orange, banana
You could also use more than just a comma for a separator. For example, this:
您还可以对分隔符使用不止一个逗号。例如,这个:
<xsl:text>'</xsl:text>
<xsl:value-of select="/root/item" separator="', '"/>
<xsl:text>'</xsl:text>
Would produce the following output:
将产生以下输出:
'apple', 'orange', 'banana'
Another XSLT 2.0 option is string-join()
...
另一个XSLT 2.0选项是string-join()……
<xsl:value-of select="string-join(/*/item,', ')"/>
#4
9
<xsl:if test="following-sibling::*">,</xsl:if>
or (perhaps more efficient, but you'd have to test):
或者(也许效率更高,但你必须进行测试):
<xsl:for-each select="*[1]">
<xsl:value-of select="."/>
<xsl:for-each select="following-sibling::*">
<xsl:value-of select="concat(',',.)"/>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:for-each>
#5
7
Robert gave the classis not(position() = last())
answer. This requires you to process the whole current node list to get context size, and in large input documents this might make the conversion consume more memory. Therefore, I normally invert the test to be the first thing
罗伯特给了班上的学生不及格的答案。这需要您处理整个当前节点列表以获得上下文大小,在大型输入文档中,这可能会使转换消耗更多的内存。因此,我通常把测试反演成第一件事
<xsl:for-each select="*">
<xsl:if test="not(position() = 1)>, </xsl:if>
<xsl:value-of select="."/>
</xsl:for-each>
#6
6
A simple XPath 1.0 one-liner:
简单的XPath 1.0一行代码:
concat(., substring(',', 2 - (position() != last())))
concat()。,子字符串(',',2 - (position() != last()))))
Put it into this transformation:
将其转化为:
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:output method="text"/>
<xsl:template match="/*">
<xsl:for-each select="*">
<xsl:value-of select=
"concat(., substring(',', 2 - (position() != last())))"
/>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
and apply it to the XML document:
并将其应用于XML文档:
<root>
<item>apple</item>
<item>orange</item>
<item>banana</item>
</root>
to get the wanted result:
要得到想要的结果:
apple,orange,banana
苹果,橘子,香蕉
EDIT:
编辑:
Here is a comment from Robert Rossney to this answer:
以下是罗伯特·罗斯尼对这个答案的评论:
That's pretty opaque code for a human to read. It requires you to know two non-obvious things about XSLT: 1) what the substring function does if its index is out of range and 2) that logical values can be implicitly converted to numerical ones.
对于人类来说,这是相当不透明的代码。它要求您了解关于XSLT的两件不明显的事情:1)如果子字符串函数的索引超出范围,它做什么;2)逻辑值可以隐式地转换为数值。
and here is my answer:
我的回答是:
Guys, never shy from learning something new. In fact this is all Stack Overflow is about, isn't it? :)
伙计们,不要羞于学习新东西。实际上这就是所有的堆栈溢出,不是吗?:)
#7
2
This is the way I got it working for me. I tested this against your list:
这就是我让它为我工作的方式。我测试了你的列表:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:output method="text" />
<xsl:template match="root">
<xsl:call-template name="comma-join"><xsl:with-param name="list" select="item"/></xsl:call-template>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template name="comma-join">
<xsl:param name="list" />
<xsl:for-each select="$list">
<xsl:value-of select="." />
<xsl:if test="position() != last()">
<xsl:text>, </xsl:text>
</xsl:if>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>