如何在Ruby中继承抽象单元测试?

I have two unit tests that should share a lot of common tests with slightly different setup methods. If I write something like

我有两个单元测试，它们应该使用稍微不同的设置方法共享许多常见的测试。如果我写

class Abstract < Test::Unit::TestCase
  def setup
    @field = create
  end

  def test_1
    ...
  end
end

class Concrete1 < Abstract
  def create
    SomeClass1.new
  end
end

class Concrete2 < Abstract
  def create
    SomeClass2.new
  end
end

then Concrete1 does not seem to inherit the tests from Abstract. Or at least I cannot get them to run in eclipse. If I choose "Run all TestCases" for the file that contains Concrete1 then Abstract is run even though I do not want it to be. If I specify Concrete1 then it does not run any tests at all! If I specify test_1 in Concrete1 then it complains it cannot find it ("uncaught throw :invalid_test (ArgumentError)").

那么具象1似乎没有从抽象中继承测试。或者至少我不能让它们在eclipse中运行。如果我为包含具象1的文件选择“运行所有的测试用例”，那么即使我不希望它运行，抽象也会运行。如果我指定了具体的内容，那么它就不会运行任何测试!如果我在具象1中指定test_1，那么它会报错找不到它(“未捕获的抛出:invalid_test (ArgumentError)”)。

I'm new to Ruby. What am I missing here?

我新Ruby。我错过了什么?

2 个解决方案

#1

The issue is that, as far as I can tell, Test::Unit keeps track of which classes inherit from Test::Unit::TestCase, and as a result, will only run tests from classes that directly inherit from it.

问题是，就我所知，Test::Unit跟踪哪些类从Test:::Unit::TestCase继承，因此，将只从直接继承它的类运行测试。

The way to work around this is to create a module with the tests you want, and then include that module in the classes that derive from Test::Unit::TestCase.

解决这个问题的方法是使用您想要的测试创建一个模块，然后将该模块包含到从Test::Unit::TestCase派生的类中。

require 'test/unit'

module TestsToInclude
  def test_name
    assert(self.class.name.start_with?("Concrete"))
  end
end

class Concrete1 < Test::Unit::TestCase
  include TestsToInclude

  def test_something_bad
    assert(false)
  end
end

class Concrete2 < Test::Unit::TestCase
  include TestsToInclude

  def test_something_good
    assert(true)
  end
end

Output:

输出:

Loaded suite a
Started
.F..
Finished in 0.027873 seconds.

  1) Failure:
test_something_bad(Concrete1) [a.rb:13]:
<false> is not true.

4 tests, 4 assertions, 1 failures, 0 errors

shell returned 1

#2

The problem is that Test::Unit::TestCase explicitly doesn't run tests defined in superclasses by default. In particular, note that TestSuiteCreator does not run tests unless Test::Unit::TestCase#valid? returns true (https://github.com/test-unit/test-unit/blob/2.5.5/lib/test/unit/testsuitecreator.rb#L40):

问题是Test::Unit::TestCase显式地不运行默认在超类中定义的测试。特别要注意的是，TestSuiteCreator不会运行测试，除非测试:Unit:::TestCase#有效?返回true(https://github.com/test-unit/test-unit/blob/2.5.5/lib/test/unit/testsuitecreator.rb # L40):

def append_test(suite, test_name)
  test = @test_case.new(test_name)
  yield(test) if block_given?
  suite << test if test.valid?
end

And what determines if a test case is valid? A test case is valid by default if the this class explicitly defined that method, or if the method was defined in a Module (https://github.com/test-unit/test-unit/blob/2.5.5/lib/test/unit/testcase.rb#L405-L418):

什么决定了一个测试用例是否有效?如果这个类显式定义了该方法，或者在模块中定义了该方法(https://github.com/testunit/test - unit/test/unit/test/unit/testcase.rb# L405-L418)，那么测试用例是有效的。

def valid? # :nodoc:
  return false unless respond_to?(@method_name)
  test_method = method(@method_name)
  if @internal_data.have_test_data?
    return false unless test_method.arity == 1
  else
    return false unless test_method.arity <= 0
  end
  owner = Util::MethodOwnerFinder.find(self, @method_name)
  if owner.class != Module and self.class != owner
    return false
  end
  true
end

So basically, if you subclass another unit test class, and you want to run the superclass's unit tests, you can either:

所以基本上，如果你子类化另一个单元测试类，你想运行超类的单元测试，你可以:

Redefine those test methods in your subclass and have them call your superclass's test method
在子类中重新定义这些测试方法，并让它们调用超类的测试方法
Move all your methods to a module (as explained in the other answer in this thread)
将所有方法移动到一个模块(在这个线程的另一个答案中解释)
Redefine the valid? method in your subclass to return true:
重新定义有效吗?方法在子类中返回true:

def valid? return true end

def有效吗?还真结束

#1