I would like to receive the following output.
我想收到以下输出。
Suppose the directory structure on the file system is like this:
假设文件系统上的目录结构是这样的：
-dir1
-dir2
-file1
-file2
-dir3
-file3
-file4
-dir4
-file5
-dir5
-dir6
-dir7
The output from the script must be like:
脚本的输出必须如下：
Directories:
目录：
/dir1 /dir1/dir2 /dir1/dir2/dir3 /dir1/dir2/dir4 /dir1/dir5 /dir1/dir5/dir6 /dir1/dir5/dir7
Files:
文件：
/dir1 /dir1/dir2/file1 /dir1/dir2/file2 /dir1/dir2/dir3/file3 /dir1/dir2/dir3/file4 /dir1/dir2/dir4/file5 /dir1/dir5/dir6 /dir1/dir5/dir7
Could you tell me how to keep the output of find . -type d and find . -type f into another file?
你能告诉我如何保持find的输出吗？ -type d并找到。 -type f进入另一个文件？
7 个解决方案
#1
79
In windows, to list only directories:
在Windows中，仅列出目录：
dir /ad /b /s
to list all files (and no directories):
列出所有文件（没有目录）：
dir /a-d /b /s
redirect the output to a file:
将输出重定向到文件：
dir /a-d /b /s > filename.txt
dir command parameters explained on wikipedia
dir命令参数在*上解释
#2
21
in shell:
在shell中：
find . -type d
gives directories from current working directory, and:
从当前工作目录中提供目录，并且：
find . -type f
gives files from current working directory.
从当前工作目录中提供文件。
Replace . by your directory of interest.
替换。由您感兴趣的目录。
#3
18
Bash/Linux Shell
Directories:
目录：
find ./ -type d
Files:
文件：
find ./ -type f
Bash/Shell Into a file
Directories:
目录：
find ./ -type d > somefile.txt
Files:
文件：
find ./ -type f > somefile.txt
#4
7
On Windows, you can do it like this as most flexibile solution that allows you to additionally process dir names.
在Windows上，你可以这样做，因为大多数flexibile解决方案允许你额外处理目录名称。
You use FOR /R to recursively execute batch commands.
您使用FOR / R递归执行批处理命令。
Check out this batch file.
看看这个批处理文件。
@echo off
SETLOCAL EnableDelayedExpansion
SET N=0
for /R %%i in (.) do (
SET DIR=%%i
::put anything here, for instance the following code add dir numbers.
SET /A N=!N!+1
echo !N! !DIR!
)
Similary for files you can add pattern as a set instead of dot, in your case
在您的情况下，类似于文件，您可以将模式添加为集合而不是点
(*.*)
#5
3
In Windows :
在Windows中：
dir /ad /b /s
dir / ad / b / s
dir /a-d /b /s
dir / a-d / b / s
#6
3
In Linux, a simple
在Linux中，简单
find . -printf '%y %p\n'
will give you a list of all the contained items, with directories and files mixed. You can save this output to a temporary file, then extract all lines that start with 'd'; those will be the directories. Lines that start with an 'f' are files.
将为您提供所有包含项目的列表，其中包含目录和文件。您可以将此输出保存到临时文件，然后提取以'd'开头的所有行;那些将是目录。以'f'开头的行是文件。
#7
2
This is an old question, but I thought I'd add something anyhow.
这是一个老问题，但我想我无论如何都会添加一些东西。
DIR doesn't traverse correctly all the directory trees you want, in particular not the ones on C:. It simply gives up in places because of different protections.
DIR没有正确遍历您想要的所有目录树，特别是C：上的目录树。由于不同的保护措施，它只是放弃了。
ATTRIB works much better, because it finds more. (Why this difference? Why would MS make one utility work one way and another work different in this respect? Damned if I know.) In my experience the most effective way to handle this, although it's a kludge, is to get two listings:
ATTRIB工作得更好，因为它找到了更多。 （为什么会出现这种差异？为什么MS会让一个实用工具单向工作而另一个工作方式在这方面有所不同？如果我知道的话会诅咒。）根据我的经验，处理这个问题最有效的方法，虽然它是一个kludge，但是要获得两个清单：
attrib /s /d C:\ >%TEMP%\C-with-directories.txt
attrib / s / d C：\>％TEMP％\ C-with-directories.txt
attrib /s C:\ >%TEMP%\C-without-directories.txt
attrib / s C：\>％TEMP％\ C-without-directories.txt
and get the difference between them. That difference is the directories on C: (except the ones that are too well hidden). For C:, I'd usually do this running as administrator.
并获得它们之间的差异。这个区别是C：上的目录（除了隐藏得太多的目录）。对于C：，我通常以管理员身份运行。
#1
79
In windows, to list only directories:
在Windows中，仅列出目录：
dir /ad /b /s
to list all files (and no directories):
列出所有文件（没有目录）：
dir /a-d /b /s
redirect the output to a file:
将输出重定向到文件：
dir /a-d /b /s > filename.txt
dir command parameters explained on wikipedia
dir命令参数在*上解释
#2
21
in shell:
在shell中：
find . -type d
gives directories from current working directory, and:
从当前工作目录中提供目录，并且：
find . -type f
gives files from current working directory.
从当前工作目录中提供文件。
Replace . by your directory of interest.
替换。由您感兴趣的目录。
#3
18
Bash/Linux Shell
Directories:
目录：
find ./ -type d
Files:
文件：
find ./ -type f
Bash/Shell Into a file
Directories:
目录：
find ./ -type d > somefile.txt
Files:
文件：
find ./ -type f > somefile.txt
#4
7
On Windows, you can do it like this as most flexibile solution that allows you to additionally process dir names.
在Windows上，你可以这样做，因为大多数flexibile解决方案允许你额外处理目录名称。
You use FOR /R to recursively execute batch commands.
您使用FOR / R递归执行批处理命令。
Check out this batch file.
看看这个批处理文件。
@echo off
SETLOCAL EnableDelayedExpansion
SET N=0
for /R %%i in (.) do (
SET DIR=%%i
::put anything here, for instance the following code add dir numbers.
SET /A N=!N!+1
echo !N! !DIR!
)
Similary for files you can add pattern as a set instead of dot, in your case
在您的情况下，类似于文件，您可以将模式添加为集合而不是点
(*.*)
#5
3
In Windows :
在Windows中：
dir /ad /b /s
dir / ad / b / s
dir /a-d /b /s
dir / a-d / b / s
#6
3
In Linux, a simple
在Linux中，简单
find . -printf '%y %p\n'
will give you a list of all the contained items, with directories and files mixed. You can save this output to a temporary file, then extract all lines that start with 'd'; those will be the directories. Lines that start with an 'f' are files.
将为您提供所有包含项目的列表，其中包含目录和文件。您可以将此输出保存到临时文件，然后提取以'd'开头的所有行;那些将是目录。以'f'开头的行是文件。
#7
2
This is an old question, but I thought I'd add something anyhow.
这是一个老问题，但我想我无论如何都会添加一些东西。
DIR doesn't traverse correctly all the directory trees you want, in particular not the ones on C:. It simply gives up in places because of different protections.
DIR没有正确遍历您想要的所有目录树，特别是C：上的目录树。由于不同的保护措施，它只是放弃了。
ATTRIB works much better, because it finds more. (Why this difference? Why would MS make one utility work one way and another work different in this respect? Damned if I know.) In my experience the most effective way to handle this, although it's a kludge, is to get two listings:
ATTRIB工作得更好，因为它找到了更多。 （为什么会出现这种差异？为什么MS会让一个实用工具单向工作而另一个工作方式在这方面有所不同？如果我知道的话会诅咒。）根据我的经验，处理这个问题最有效的方法，虽然它是一个kludge，但是要获得两个清单：
attrib /s /d C:\ >%TEMP%\C-with-directories.txt
attrib / s / d C：\>％TEMP％\ C-with-directories.txt
attrib /s C:\ >%TEMP%\C-without-directories.txt
attrib / s C：\>％TEMP％\ C-without-directories.txt
and get the difference between them. That difference is the directories on C: (except the ones that are too well hidden). For C:, I'd usually do this running as administrator.
并获得它们之间的差异。这个区别是C：上的目录（除了隐藏得太多的目录）。对于C：，我通常以管理员身份运行。